3/14/2024 0 Comments Netspot sees 2 2.4 wifi![]() ![]() 2.4 GHz has also been widely used for a longer period of time, so more 2.4 GHz devices have been deployed. 2.4 GHz is cheaper to implement than its 5 GHz counterpart, so manufacturers leverage it to save costs. ![]() 2.4 GHz vs 5 GHz: Popularity, interference, throughput, and rangeĢ.4 GHz is more popular than 5 GHz at the moment, but both are widely used. Note that this is a generalization, and available channels vary depending on location and channel size. Using 20 MHz, there are 24 non-overlapping channels available within the 5 GHz band. However, an additional range of Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (UNII) bands widens that range to 750 MHz. The 5 GHz Wi-Fi band covers a 150 MHz range from 5.725 GHz to 5.875 GHz. For example, only 11 channels are available in the United States. Note that due to varying regulations, not all channels are available for use in all locations. With 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, there are four non-overlapping 20 MHz channels: 1, 6, 11, and 14. This is important to understand because overlapping Wi-Fi channels can interfere with one another. ![]() This is greater than the 100 MHz size of the 2.4 GHz band, which means that channels overlap. If you do the math, you'll quickly see that 14 bands of 20 MHz equals 180 MHz. Note that channels 1, 6, 11, and 14 do not overlap. Note in the image above that there are 14 channels in the 2.4 GHz band. With 5 GHz, if you don't have to worry about interference and all your client devices support it, go with the highest width available.įor a practical example of how to optimize Wi-Fi, check out how CBT Nuggets trainer Keith Barker uses NetSpot and SweetSpots to examine channels for potential interference, map his coverage, and improve his home wireless network in this video: Conversely, with 5 GHz, increasing channel width can improve performance, but there are tradeoffs. With 2.4 GHz, increasing your channel width often isn't worth it, and you should stick with 20 MHz. With multiple standards and a variety of tradeoffs, it can be hard to keep up with best practices.Įvery wireless environment is different, and you need to tailor your equipment to the conditions. Getting it right isn't always straightforward, though. Selecting the right width can have a huge impact. Channel width plays a big role in Wi-Fi performance. Or someone else here had a similar issue and knows more possible things to check already.Improving and managing Wi-Fi performance is important to everyone, from home users to large enterprises. If you have the logs (AP and/or client) it might be helpful, if not, we have to carefully review this step-by-step. It can either be the driver that has issues with some feature that is enabled for the wireless, or RF environment issue, or someone spoofing deassociation frames, or… Unfortunately I’ve no checklist ready for this situation. Once I had such issue when the devices in a certain area were very likely to roam between two same-distance APs but it was connected with AP configuration issue (beacon interval 300 + DTIM 5) and it happened every minute impacting client throughput very badly. If we don’t have any suspected configuration change that happened half year ago, I would focus on checking the RF environment now.Īre you able to grab some logs from the APs themselves? It would be the easiest way to try to determine the reason. In the end, it might be good for you to contact GTAC ( ) so they could assist you with more thorough response at once. Channel/SSID distribution graph could also help to provide some insight. with some colored rectangles on SSID names and BSSIDs) with list of BSSIDs that a sample affected client device can see (Netspot provides channel, signal strength etc. InSSIDer or Netspot could be helpful if you were able to provide a table (anonymized e.g. Or some interference decreases the 5 GHz channel quality (153?157? is non-DFS channel so no such event I consider) so the devices jumps off to 2.4 GHz. If it’s congested (depends how much) maybe the devices hunger for better SNR/RSSI and thus jump all over the place. RF is congested - many client devices per AP? Many APs on the same channel? This behaviour (switching between bands) could be induced by client’s band preference + congested channels as you say, less likely some load balancing among the APs that should not be a part of a load balancing group (APs in different rooms).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |